Thursday, October 1, 2026

 

TECH


Screen effect: Young people's reading skills are declining — and experts fear the impact on anxiety and loneliness

During the 1990s and early 2000s, it was common to hear that this was one of the most well-prepared generations in history. Access to universities was growing, and there was optimism regarding the effects of educational expansion. A few decades later, professors and researchers are raising a different concern: many young people seem to struggle more with reading long, complex texts.

In the United States, university professors report students who cannot keep up with reading lists that were once considered standard. The phenomenon involves changes in education, the loss of reading habits, and a daily life dominated by screens and rapid stimuli.

The problem has already reached American universities. Jessica Hooten Wilson, a professor at Pepperdine University, told *Fortune* that the difficulty observed in some students goes beyond critical thinking.

According to her, there are students who struggle to comprehend even specific sentences and more complex sentence structures.

Other professors report a similar shift. Reading assignments of 25 to 40 pages between classes—once considered normal—are now viewed by some students as a burden that is difficult to manage.

In this context, artificial intelligence tools have entered the equation. Instead of reading the full material, some students turn to chatbots to generate summaries of key points.

This method may speed up studying, but it also eliminates some of the context, nuances, and details found during a full reading.

Consequently, universities have begun adapting their classes. Some have reduced the volume of required reading. Others have started conducting group readings in class or replacing some written content with audio and video.

The problem may begin long before university...The signs are not limited to college students.

Educational data from the United States also reveals difficulties among younger students. In some schools, full books have been replaced by shorter excerpts, reducing students' exposure to lengthy texts. Recent results from U.S. assessments indicate that students are underperforming compared to their counterparts from a decade ago in certain areas. Experts have even used the term "learning recession" to describe part of this trend.

While the pandemic exacerbated various educational issues, it does not account for everything; some negative trends were already evident prior to 2020.

Similar signs are appearing outside the United States. In France, data cited by neuroscientist Michel Desmurget point to reading difficulties among a segment of young adults.

In Spain, conversely, recent indicators regarding the reading habits of children and adolescents are more positive. Even so, teachers report issues with attention and reading comprehension in the classroom.

A major concern is the rise of so-called "skimming" or superficial reading.

Instead of following a text from beginning to end, the reader searches for keywords, highlighted phrases, and quick information. While this behavior is quite useful in certain situations, it differs from the deep reading required to grasp complex arguments.

According to teachers in the United States, some students struggle to maintain focus on long texts.

This difficulty can also trigger an emotional reaction. When individuals come to believe they cannot comprehend a particular book or article, they may avoid reading altogether, thereby losing even more practice.

The result is a potential cycle: less reading leads to reduced familiarity with complex texts, making the next reading experience even more challenging.

Books also help us understand others...The concern extends beyond academic grades. Research links reading habits to various cognitive and social benefits. Books—particularly narratives—expose readers to perspectives, experiences, and situations different from their own.

This can foster skills related to empathy and the understanding of other people.

Michel Desmurget further argues that reading provides valuable knowledge about the world and helps develop the tools needed to analyze information critically. For this reason, researchers and educators fear that a prolonged decline in deep reading could leave young people more vulnerable to simplistic interpretations and misinformation.

Some experts also raise a broader hypothesis: a society that reads less might lose one of the cultural activities that help people share experiences and discuss ideas.

This does not mean that abandoning books directly causes anxiety or loneliness; these phenomena have multiple causes. However, researchers are debating whether the loss of reading-related habits might contribute to an environment of greater isolation.

Our language also seems to be getting simpler...The transformation isn't limited to the reader.

Research has found signs of simplification across various forms of communication. Studies analyzing song lyrics over recent decades have observed shifts in linguistic complexity.

Analyses of political speeches have also identified changes in vocabulary and message structure.

Even certain contemporary books feature more accessible language compared to works from earlier eras.

There is no single explanation for this; cultural, commercial, educational, and technological changes are occurring simultaneously.

But there is one factor impossible to ignore: screens.

Smartphones have changed our relationship with information...Television was already competing with books decades before the internet arrived.

Studies cited by Desmurget show that the leisure time adolescents devoted to reading had already dropped sharply during the second half of the 20th century.

Smartphones and social media have intensified this battle for attention.

Spending hours consuming digital content simply means having less time available for other activities. However, researchers are also studying how the format of these platforms influences the way we consume information.

Short videos, notifications, and infinite feeds provide constant stimulation. Information must grab attention quickly before the user swipes to the next piece of content.

Ángel Barbas, a professor of Communication Theory at UNED, argues that this information avalanche fosters rapid processing and can make it difficult to sustain deep reading.

A generation raised without pauses...To blame young people exclusively would be to ignore the environment in which they grew up.

Generation Z spent much of their childhood and adolescence in an already digitized world. Generation Alpha is growing up in an even more connected environment.

Ariadna Vilalta, author of *Una vida siempre en línea* ("A Life Always Online"), highlights a childhood marked by constant stimulation and few moments of pause.

There is also a shift in life away from screens. In many families, safety concerns have curtailed children's autonomy to play and socialize without supervision. More time spent indoors can also mean more time in front of electronic devices.

Screens, therefore, can be both a cause and a consequence of much broader social shifts.

Reading could become a new kind of privilege...The most worrying consequence may only emerge in the long run.

If the ability to grapple with complex texts becomes increasingly rare, skills related to interpretation, argumentation, and critical thinking could end up being distributed unequally.

In this scenario, families with greater resources could continue to provide books, quiet environments, quality schools, and less reliance on screens, while other groups would have fewer opportunities to develop these habits.

Digital disconnection is already being framed as a sort of modern luxury. Reading could follow the same path. The challenge, then, is not simply to convince a generation to swap smartphones for books. It is to rebuild spaces for attention, silence, and time—allowing children and young people to learn something no technology has rendered obsolete: how to pause before a complex idea and devote enough time to truly understand it.

Young people's reading skills and habits are declining primarily due to the constant distraction of smartphones, social media, and short-form digital content that shorten attention spans and replace deep reading.

Recent reports, assessments, and analyses highlight several core factors contributing to this trend:

Key causes of the decline:

• Digital distractions and Short-Form Media: Platforms like TikTok, Instagram Reels, and general smartphone use train young brains to skim information and crave fast-paced entertainment. This makes focusing on long, dense, or complex texts feel difficult and frustrating.

• The rise of generative AI: Tools that instantly supply ready-made answers reduce the need for young people to wrestle with text, analyze information, and build vocabulary or comprehension skills independently.

• Loss of foundational instruction time: Disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic caused lasting gaps in basic reading fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.

• Inadequate teacher training: Many school districts mandate early literacy screenings, but teachers often lack sufficient professional development or confidence to interpret screening data and apply effective instructional methods.

• Simpler books and skimming habits: Even popular modern literature features shorter sentences and simpler structures, reducing the regular mental exercise required to parse sophisticated arguments or literary works

mundophone

Wednesday, September 30, 2026


HMD


HMD debuts new affordable 5G smartphone with 120 Hz display and 6,000mAh battery

HMD has launched the Vibe2 Pro smartphone in India. The company’s new affordable 5G smartphone features a 64 MP Sony IMX682 primary camera, a MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor, and a 120 Hz FHD+ display. Plus, the device comes in silver mist, aqua green, and cosmic purple color options.

Earlier this year, HMD announced the vanilla Vibe2 smartphone. Now, the brand has introduced the Vibe2 Pro smartphone with an interesting set of features in India. Under the hood, the device is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chipset paired with up to 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage with room for storage expansion via microSD card. 

You get a 64 MP Sony IMX682 main camera complemented by a 2 MP macro camera. There is a 13 MP camera at the front for selfies and video calls. A 6,000 mAh battery powers the entire system and supports 33 W wired charging. It boasts a 6.78-inch LCD display that outputs at FHD+ resolutions with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. 

Software-wise, the Vibe2 Pro runs Android 16 out of the box, and the company promises only two years of security updates for the smartphone. Unfortunately, there’s no word on major Android update support, indicating it may never arrive. Other features include a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, a microSD card slot, stereo speakers, a 3.5 mm headphone jack, dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, GPS, and 5G connectivity. 

Available in aqua green, cosmic purple, and silver mist color options, the HMD Vibe2 Pro starts at ₹14,999 ($156) for the base 6 GB + 128 GB model, while the 8 GB + 128 GB model is priced at ₹16,999 ($177). It will be available for purchase on Flipkart starting 8th October.

In addition to its high-capacity battery and high-resolution camera setup, the device is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor. It features a 6.78-inch LCD screen with Full HD+ resolution and a 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring much smoother visuals during navigation and gaming.

On the back, the phone sports the aforementioned 64 MP Sony IMX682 main sensor, accompanied by a 2 MP macro lens for close-up shots. For selfies and video calls, the front houses a 13 MP camera.

The device is powered by a 6,000 mAh battery that supports 33 W wired charging. The Vibe 2 Pro ships with the new Android 16 operating system and includes region-exclusive artificial intelligence tools.

Software and connectivity...The smartphone runs on Android 16. HMD promises to release security updates for two years. The system integrates the Indus AI assistant from Sarvam AI, designed to support 22 Indian languages and local cultural context. The service’s servers and data are hosted in India.

The Sanchar Saathi government platform is also supported, allowing users to check mobile numbers registered to them, report fraudulent calls, and block lost or stolen smartphones. Installing the application remains voluntary.

Among other features are a side-mounted fingerprint scanner, stereo speakers, two microphones, a USB Type-C port, a 3.5mm audio jack, 5G, Wi-Fi 5, and Bluetooth 5.2.

The body dimensions are 168,4 × 76,3 × 8,3 mm, and the weight is 197 grams.

The smartphone also features a standard headphone jack, a side-mounted fingerprint scanner, a microSD card slot, stereo speakers, and a USB-C port. Connectivity options include 5G support, dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, and GPS.

6.78-inch LCD screen with Full HD+ resolution

120 Hz refresh rate display

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 platform

6 GB or 8 GB of RAM

128 GB of storage

13 MP front camera

Dual rear camera setup

64 MP main sensor

2 MP macro sensor

5G, dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, GPS, USB-C port, and headphone jack

6,000 mAh battery with 33 W charging

Android 16 operating system

 

mundophone

 

TECH


Video games could make us better people

Addiction, violence, aggression, social withdrawal: Video games have been in the crosshairs for a litany of negative impacts. Researchers at Macquarie University, however, are working on the premise that video games can have positive impacts, too—that just as pilots use simulators to learn and hone their flight skills, people could use video games to develop their moral skills.

"Some of the same sorts of moral skills we use in real life can be used in games, and games can interact with those skills and develop them. That's really what we've been looking at in our research," says Dr. Paul Formosa, senior lecturer in the Department of Philosophy.

"A lot of the media around video games is pretty negative and a lot of the research, too, has been on the negative effects—meta-analysis shows there is some real-life impact of video games, but it's not huge and it's not shown in every single study—but we're far more interested in the positive effects, which are much less studied."

Formosa is part of a multidisciplinary team that, based on its theoretical findings, is building a video game for experiments examining how different design features can engage various moral skills.

Those features include timers and how they affect decision-making, and whether so-called virtue meters, which award points for good deeds and vice versa, instrumentalize morality so that players seek to maximize the meter rather than engage with the moral issues.

Video Games Could Make Us Better Decision Makers...While many people play video games for fun, new research suggests that they could actually help us to be better at making decisions.

A recent study from Georgia State University compared response times and brain activity in people who played a lot of video games and people who played them only a little during a decision-making task.

The study involved 47 college-age participants, 28 of whom played video games for at least five hours per week over the last two years, and 19 of whom played less than an hour per week. These two groups were referred to as "video game players" and "non-video game players."

The games played by video game players were all types that require quick responses, such as first-person shooters and real-time strategy games.

All participants were given the same task, which involved deciding which way different colored dots were moving on a screen, and pressing left or right buttons on a controller with their thumbs. The participants were asked to respond as quickly and accurately as possible.

It was found that, on average, video game players were faster by 190 milliseconds and 2% more accurate than non-video game players. Brain scanning during the task also showed more activity in three regions of the gamers' brains compared to the non-gamers' brains.

According to the researchers, these results show that video game playing can change the brain, and might improve processes for sensation, perception and directing action, which can help to improve decision making skills.

The researchers also noted that the results showed no "trade-off" between speed and accuracy among participants who played video games, adding that this shows video game playing could be a good method of cognitive training for making decisions.

"Video games are played by the overwhelming majority of our youth more than three hours every week," said lead researcher Dr. Mukesh Dhamala. "But the beneficial effects on decision-making abilities and the brain are not exactly known."

"Our work provides some answers on that," he said.

'It's important not to have a moral panic'...Formosa says the research has employed moral psychology to pinpoint four moral skills (see below) that people need in real life and that games can engage.

Many commercial games already engage these skills. Examples include "Papers, Please," in which the player is an immigration officer checking papers on the border of a totalitarian state; "The Walking Dead," which holds the player accountable for their life-and-death choices and asks them to justify their actions; and "This War of Mine," where you're a civilian stuck in a war zone having to make all sorts of tough choices to survive.

"Fortnite"—the shoot-'em-up game du jour—does not, in case you were wondering, engage moral skills. But Formosa does not have a problem with that, and he emphasizes that researchers are not suggesting violent games should not be played.

"It's important not to have a moral panic about games in general because they are not a homogeneous group," he says.

"People play them for all sorts of reasons. Some games require a lot more focus and engagement than others. A lot of people play short games on their phones for 5 or 10 minutes, "Candy Crush" and so forth, which are not supposed to be deep engagements; they are something to pass the time, and for some people they can relieve stress. So short instances of gaming like that can also have positive effects.

"We're not saying that games like 'Fortnite' shouldn't be played. They have their role, but so do these other sorts of ethical games."

Gamer stereotypes are out the window...Formosa says more than 50% of people play games regularly. Many of them are women, and the average age is increasing, sitting right now in the mid-30s.

"People have this image of the gamer as this teenage boy, but that's very inaccurate," he says.

"When you look on the train, the 50-year-old woman is playing games on the mobile phone just as much as the 13-year-old boy; she may not be pulling out the Xbox when she gets home, but these are still forms of games."

Dr. Malcolm Ryan, senior lecturer for games design and development in Macquarie's Department of Computing, is leading the design of the experimental game, which Formosa describes as Australian noir: "It's set in the 1940s and '50s, in a town cinema where there's going to be a fire and a whole bunch of difficult moral judgments people will have to engage with."

Writing the dialogue is Associate Professor Jane Messer, from the Creative Writing program in the Department of English, while Dr. Stephanie Howarth, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Cognitive Science, has brought expertise in moral psychology to the project.

The moral skills the experimental game will seek to engage include:

Moral sensitivity, which is about being sensitive to the very presence of moral situations, which "we can often overlook or just ignore or not see," Formosa says. "You can see this in games where sometimes people might not even notice the moral issues at stake."

Moral judgment. "Often games will have big moral judgments where you have to choose between A and B, or decide whether you sacrifice some people to save these other people, and that's a really useful way to practice and develop your moral judgment without real-world stakes."

Moral focus, which is about prioritizing moral concerns when they conflict with self-interest.

Moral action. This involves implementing moral judgment, which "might require a fair bit of perseverance or excellent communication skills or a lot of emotional maturity."

"What we're interested in is different ways games can be designed so they can engage with these different moral skills," Formosa says.

"We want to look at why some design choices might be better than others, and ultimately, hopefully, that would get incorporated into commercial games."

Provided by Macquarie University

Tuesday, September 29, 2026


TECH


AI won't make the call: Why human judgment still drives innovation

Business leaders and entrepreneurs increasingly turn to generative AI software for ideas and advice. Yet, despite widespread access, not all receive the same benefits of this technology—at times because users themselves differ (and those differences can reflect broader societal disparities). New research shows human experience and judgment are still critical to making decisions, because AI can't reliably distinguish good ideas from mediocre ones or guide long-term business strategies on its own. Knowing the limitations of these tools, how to apply human oversight to their output, and how to recognize ways in which they might reinforce rather than break down barriers, is critical to using them effectively.

Since ChatGPT's launch in late 2022, generative AI tools have increasingly been adopted to craft business documents and presentations, write computer code, and generate images. They're also used by business leaders and entrepreneurs to help brainstorm strategies, flesh out ideas, and probe the weak points of a business plan.

Yet, while millions of people now have access to artificial intelligence, not all of them receive the same benefits.

One striking example comes from a study by academics at Harvard Business School and the University of California at Berkeley, which revealed that today's AI can't substitute for human judgment or experience, meaning the technology alone cannot overcome unequal skills, which may be influenced by disparities in education, access to training, and digital literacy.

For artificial intelligence to have more holistic impact, executives and entrepreneurs must acquire not only the skills to use AI effectively, but those that lead to productive decision-making and sound strategy. In short, they must develop solid business judgment.

“For anybody who’s using AI in their work, you need to think carefully about the person who’s using the tool,” said Rembrand M. Koning, an associate professor at Harvard Business School. “Do they have enough judgment for tasks that are required?”

In the study, titled “The Uneven Impact of Generative AI on Entrepreneurial Performance,” Koning and a team of scholars worked with 640 small business entrepreneurs in Kenya to test the effect of an AI assistant optimized to give business advice.

Roughly half the participants received access to the AI and could communicate via the popular messaging program WhatsApp. The other half received access to written business guides developed by the International Labor Organization. The experiment is thought to be the first such test conducted in the developing world.

When the study concluded, the researchers were surprised to see no statistical difference in business performance, as measured by a formula based on revenue and profit, suggesting that investment in support, training, and decision-making frameworks may be as important as access to AI tools themselves.

“If we want to realize the democratizing promise of AI tools, business and policy leaders need to address gaps in access to the underlying skills and knowledge that allow people to use the technology effectively. Otherwise, these tools are likely to perpetuate the very inequalities they purport to overcome,” said Colleen Ammerman, director of the Race, Gender & Equity Initiative at Harvard Business School.

Helping entrepreneurs make decisions...Before the study began, the research team worked with additional Kenyan entrepreneurs to test and tune the virtual assistant, which was based on OpenAI's GPT-4 AI model.

This process led to an assistant that provided users with a numbered list of three to five “tailored, actionable, enumerated strategies” in response to business questions. Users could then respond with the number of a particular suggestion to drill deeper and receive an additional three to five on-topic tips.

As the researchers honed the instructions they gave the AI, Koning, who has also researched how entrepreneurs get advice from each other and from business mentors, said he was impressed by the ability to steer it in a direction intended to be more helpful specifically to entrepreneurs in Kenya.

“I also became more and more convinced about the potential power of this technology to help entrepreneurs everywhere,” he said.

Entrepreneurs given access to the assistant indeed put it to use, with the average user receiving nearly two dozen suggestions, on topics ranging from chicken cultivation to expanding offerings at a car wash to how to deal with bankruptcy. Yet the researchers found the initial results — no major differences between those with the AI and those in the control group — perplexing.

Thinking that the AI advice might have had a stronger effect on businesspeople who previously weren't doing as well, the researchers then examined the effect of AI access on previously high-performing and low-performing entrepreneurs. Again, they were surprised.

“When we looked at the data, we kind of fell out of our seats,” he said.

They found that the assistant appeared to boost the performance of entrepreneurs who were already doing well, raising their profits and revenues by about 10% to 15%, and actually lowered the results of those who were already on the low-performing side, who saw their numbers decrease by about 8%. Even though the AI had been designed with Kenyan entrepreneurs in mind, it didn’t on its own ameliorate—and even worsened—deficiencies that struggling business owners faced.

How to use an AI advisor...It appeared to be the opposite of what several other AI studies have found. Recent research suggests that AI assistance can bring the most benefit to lower-performing workers who carry out jobs such as taxi route optimization, management consulting tasks, and customer support. In those studies, AI appeared to disproportionately help less-skilled or less-experienced workers more than their higher-performing peers. Yet among the Kenyan entrepreneurs, the performance gap actually widened.

“We were shocked, a little puzzled, and then had to dig into our data to try to understand why,” Koning said.

What they found was that the difference wasn't between the types of questions users asked the AI or the responses they received in return, which weren't significantly different between high and low performers. Instead, it appeared that the high-performing users selected different advice from the AI to follow.

In many cases, they followed recommendations specific to their businesses, including one entrepreneur who took advice on buying a generator to deal with rolling blackouts in his area; one who began selling cold sodas to patrons of his car wash; and one who received guidance on what sort of chickens to buy for an agricultural business.

“I don't think a lot of people at Harvard Business School have great advice on what the best chickens are, but the AI knew and was able to give him exactly the advice he needed,” Koning said. “But he needed the judgment to know to listen to that advice.”

By contrast, the low-performing entrepreneurs were more likely to take more generic suggestions, such as lowering prices or focusing on advertising. The trouble is that those more general tips can't address deeper business issues and can actually backfire, because advertising and discounts cost money that may not be recouped without other strategies to grow a business.

Experience and judgment matter...In the future, Koning said it may be possible to steer the AI away from offering generic suggestions by ensuring it has more context about specific businesses, but

for now, human judgment remains critical to interpreting and applying advice, whatever the source.

Research in other domains supports this view. One study from the London School of Economics and Political Science, which randomly assigned some participants in university debates assistance from ChatGPT in developing arguments, found the AI tool seemed to disproportionately benefit stronger debaters, who could better judge which of the AI's suggested angles of argument were more likely to prevail.

Another recent study from scholars at the University of Minnesota and the University of Texas at Dallas, tasked participants with a variety of expertise in writing ad copy to do the job with assistance from generative AI, either using the technology as a ghostwriter that actually generated ad content or simply as a sounding board. The researchers found using AI as a sounding board was beneficial to the non-expert writers, but using the technology as a ghostwriter delivered no benefit and actually reduced the performance of expert users.

In other words, human expertise and creativity still matter, as do fundamental skills like communication and critical thinking. The research by Koning and his colleagues suggests that today's AI can't substitute for human experience, and that access to AI isn't a replacement for general education or business-specific training.

AI adoption requires expansive education...These findings suggest that AI isn’t necessarily an antidote to inequality. While there are many reasons users might differ in skill and knowledge, access to quality education is well known to differ by socioeconomic strata. Research on organizations has found that race and gender can influence who receives developmental learning opportunities. When it comes to entrepreneurship, the human networks through which information and expert knowledge flow have been shown to have limited racial and gender diversity. These underlying access gaps may influence the extent to which users are equipped to leverage even the best AI tools.

Embedded inequality can surface earlier in the process of AI adoption, too. Prior research by Koning and colleagues found that women were less likely to use generative AI tools. In that report, Koning and his colleagues examined 18 studies involving more than 140,000 students and workers who use AI in the United States, China, Mexico and other countries. Only one of those studies showed women using AI more than men. The rest showed the share of women using AI was 10% to 40% smaller, with the average being 25%.

Koning notes that, for women, the downside risks of using AI tools could be greater than for male peers. Studies of gender in the workplace have consistently found that women face more skepticism about their competence than men, awareness of which could fuel reluctance to take advantage of tools that replace human effort. Particularly in organizations where women feel an imperative to repeatedly prove their expertise or standing, they may worry that taking advantage of AI-generated information opens them up to additional scrutiny.

Unfortunately, the gender gap in AI use could perpetuate gender inequities over time, as well as diminish overall company productivity, Koning said. Women who don’t use AI may not advance as quickly, and AI tools may wind up lacking critical input from women, potentially leading to bias in the information offered by the technology.

For generative AI to reach its full potential in business, and to address inequality, requires investing in access to the technology, training in AI skills, and the general and business-specific education that has long helped entrepreneurs of all kinds innovate and prosper.

In some cases, Koning suggested, this may mean the case study framework that’s long been a hallmark of business schools. AI users may also benefit from training and instruction that’s specific to the new technology, including the understanding that it is okay—ideal even—to meet its suggestions with skepticism rooted in the user’s human expertise and experience. One recent study from scholars at Dickinson College and Stevens Institute of Technology found that humans collaborating with AI performed better when they were prompted to critically analyze the output of the AI rather than just treating it as fact.

“We really need to think about the ways we can help people gain those skills, gain that judgment,” Koning said. “I think it's just a really pressing and important problem.”

Author: Steven Melendez--Harvard Business School

 

TECH


AMD’s 31-chip Zen 6 EPYC 9006 lineup spans 8 to 256 cores

MD’s complete EPYC 9006 “Venice” lineup has surfaced with 31 Zen 6 and Zen 6c processors spanning the SP7 and SP8 platforms. The former will be available later this year, while the latter is expected to surface in early 2027.

AMD has published the complete processor lineup for its sixth-generation Zen 6-based Epyc 9006 series (H/T StorageReview). It reveals 31 server CPUs spanning two platforms. AMD originally introduced the series with its EPYC 9006 "Venice" processors at Advancing AI 2026 in July. While several flagship models and their pricing were already known, the company has now filled out the range with nine SP7 processors and another 22 SP8 models. AMD has also moved away from using TDP for these processors. Its product pages instead quote "Default CPU Power", which encompasses power consumption across the CPU's compute and I/O dies at its specified performance target.

The SP7 platform supports 16 DDR5 memory channels and 96 PCIe 6.0 lanes, with processors ranging from 64 to 256 cores. The flagship EPYC 9996 combines 256 Zen 6c cores and 512 threads with 1,024 MB of L3 cache. It has a 2.55 GHz base clock, boosts to 4.1 GHz and carries a 600 W default CPU power rating. The EPYC 9G76 is also listed as an orderable 96-core processor for $11,622. 

Prices quoted by AMD are 1Ku prices, meaning the listed figure represents the per-processor price when purchased in quantities of 1,000 units rather than necessarily what an individual chip will cost through retail channels. That $14,904 price is not itself new. AMD had already used the figure when comparing the Epyc 9996 against Intel's Xeon 6980P in July. The notable development is that AMD has now disclosed pricing and specifications for the rest of the lineup.

AMD has published the full EPYC 9006 series product lineup, confirming specifications and 1,000-unit pricing for 31 Zen 6 server processors. The family is split between nine SP7 processors and 22 SP8 models. Pricing ranges from $700 for the 8-core EPYC 9016 to $14,904 for the 256-core EPYC 9996.

SP7 is AMD’s larger 16-channel DDR5 platform. The lineup starts with the 64-core EPYC 9556 at $8,008 and reaches the 256-core EPYC 9996 at $14,904. The flagship has 256 cores and 512 threads, a 2.55 GHz base clock, up to 4.1 GHz boost and 1GB of L3 cache. Its Default CPU Power is rated at 600W with with a configurable range between 400W and 600W.

The SP7 range also includes the 192-core EPYC 9966 at $14,079, 168-core EPYC 9846 at $13,114 and 128-core EPYC 9756 at $12,498. AMD offers three 96-core models, including the EPYC 9686F with a boost clock of up to 5.0 GHz. The EPYC 9G76, used as a host processor in AMD Helios compute trays, is also listed as a standalone SKU at $11,622.

SP8 uses eight DDR5 memory channels and offers up to 128 PCIe 6.0 lanes. The 22-model lineup covers configurations from 8 to 128 cores. The fastest SP8 model by core count is the EPYC 9746 with 128 cores, 512MB of L3 cache and a 400W power rating for $11,679. A lower-priced 128-core EPYC 9736P is available for single-socket servers at $9,989.

AMD also has six high-frequency F-series processors in the SP8 lineup. These include models with 16, 24, 32, 48, 64 and 96 cores, all reaching up to 5.0 GHz. At the bottom of the stack, the EPYC 9116 offers 16 cores for $1,200, while the EPYC 9016 has eight cores, a 4.8 GHz boost clock and a $700 price.

AMD’s published specifications also clarify PCIe lane counts for the two platforms. SP7 processors are listed with 96 PCIe 6.0 lanes, while SP8 models have 128 lanes. One processor previously referenced by AMD, the 256-core EPYC 9956 rated at 400W, does not currently appear in the published product list. AMD states that the lineup remains subject to change.

ModelCores / ThreadsBaseBoostL3 cacheDefault CPU powerSockets1Ku price
EPYC 9996256 / 5122.55 GHz4.1 GHz1,024 MB600 W (400-600 W)1P / 2P$14,904
EPYC 9966192 / 3842.9 GHz4.0 GHz768 MB600 W (400-600 W)1P / 2P$14,079
EPYC 9846168 / 3362.85 GHz3.7 GHz768 MB500 W (320-500 W)1P / 2P$13,114
EPYC 9756128 / 2563.15 GHz4.0 GHz512 MB500 W (320-500 W)1P / 2P$12,498
EPYC 9G7696 / 1923.4 GHz4.8 GHz384 MB500 W (320-500 W)1P / 2P$11,622
EPYC 9686F96 / 1923.4 GHz5.0 GHz384 MB500 W (400-600 W)1P / 2P$11,434
EPYC 965696 / 1923.05 GHz3.7 GHz512 MB400 W (220-400 W)1P / 2P$9,713
EPYC 9586F64 / 1283.75 GHz5.0 GHz384 MB500 W (400-600 W)1P / 2P$9,701
EPYC 955664 / 1282.75 GHz4.3 GHz384 MB300 W (220-300 W)1P / 2P$8,008

The larger Epyc SP8 family extends much further down the stack. These processors use eight DDR5 memory channels but offer 128 PCIe 6.0 lanes, with core counts ranging from eight to 128. AMD also offers several high-frequency "F" variants that can boost to 5 GHz, alongside single-socket "P" models. At the bottom sits the $700 EPYC 9016 with eight cores, 16 threads and a 130 W default CPU power rating. At the other end, the 128-core EPYC 9746 costs $11,679.

ModelCores / ThreadsBaseBoostL3 cacheDefault CPU powerSockets1Ku price
EPYC 9746128 / 2562.9 GHz4.0 GHz512 MB400 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$11,679
EPYC 9736128 / 2562.7 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB360 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$10,639
EPYC 9736P128 / 2562.7 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB360 W (200-400 W)1P$9,989
EPYC 9676F96 / 1923.1 GHz5.0 GHz384 MB400 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$10,116
EPYC 964696 / 1922.8 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB300 W (155-300 W)1P / 2P$8,904
EPYC 9646P96 / 1922.8 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB300 W (155-300 W)1P$8,001
EPYC 9576F64 / 1283.55 GHz5.0 GHz384 MB400 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$9,431
EPYC 953664 / 1283.25 GHz4.0 GHz256 MB300 W (155-300 W)1P / 2P$7,837
EPYC 952664 / 1282.75 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB220 W (130-220 W)1P / 2P$7,123
EPYC 9536P64 / 1283.25 GHz4.0 GHz256 MB300 W (155-300 W)1P$6,595
EPYC 9476F48 / 963.65 GHz5.0 GHz192 MB330 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$6,695
EPYC 945648 / 963.2 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB265 W (155-300 W)1P / 2P$5,252
EPYC 9456P48 / 963.2 GHz3.7 GHz256 MB265 W (155-300 W)1P$4,628
EPYC 9376F32 / 643.8 GHz5.0 GHz192 MB285 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$4,849
EPYC 935632 / 643.6 GHz4.5 GHz192 MB250 W (155-300 W)1P / 2P$3,789
EPYC 933632 / 643.15 GHz3.7 GHz128 MB195 W (130-220 W)1P / 2P$3,320
EPYC 9356P32 / 643.6 GHz4.5 GHz192 MB250 W (155-300 W)1P$2,795
EPYC 9276F24 / 483.8 GHz5.0 GHz96 MB230 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$3,512
EPYC 925624 / 482.85 GHz4.5 GHz96 MB190 W (130-220 W)1P / 2P$2,501
EPYC 9176F16 / 323.9 GHz5.0 GHz192 MB200 W (200-400 W)1P / 2P$3,787
EPYC 911616 / 322.85 GHz4.5 GHz48 MB160 W (130-220 W)1P / 2P$1,200
EPYC 90168 / 163.05 GHz4.8 GHz48 MB130 W (130-220 W)1P / 2P$700

AMD's previously announced launch schedule remains unchanged. Systems based on the high-end SP7 platform are expected in Q4 2026, while SP8 systems are scheduled to follow in the first half of 2027.

  TECH Screen effect: Young people's reading skills are declining — and experts fear the impact on anxiety and loneliness During the 199...